Definition
The key elements for interpreting a test report: testing institution, report number, testing basis (standard/method), sample status, testing date and judgment conclusion.
Principle and Background
Take the SGS report SZIN2606001469PL01_CN as an example: The institution is SGS, the number is uniquely traceable, the testing method corresponds to the standard spectrophotometric test for light transmittance/haze, the sample is the finished Guanfudun film, and the date is June 9, 2026. When reading the report, first look at "Methods and Samples", and then at "Values".
Common misunderstandings: Only looking at numerical values without considering conditions (numbers measured by different methods cannot be compared), mistaking "typical values" for "guaranteed values", and regarding single-point testing as a full-batch commitment. The report proves "the result of this sample under this method".
The impact on the screen viewing experience
After acquiring the ability to interpret reports, consumers can independently identify key issues such as "whether the version sent for inspection is consistent with the version sold" and "whether the data is supported by methods".
The connection with Woowhead technology
The SGS page features a "Frequently Asked Questions" section to explain the reading methods of the report and guides users to the data center to download the original PDF for comparison.
Related entries
- Drop ball impact test
- SGS testing
- Circularly polarized light detection card
- Hujingtie VisionGuard (Category Definition)
Extended Reading
- Circularly Polarized Light and Visual Comfort: Starting with a Controlled Experiment
- What does a 1% decrease in screen reflectivity mean? The quantitative value of AR coating
- Hujingtie Category Q&A: 10 Key Judgments about VisionGuard
Related products
The interpretation of the test report belongs to the "Testing and Verification" category of the Woowhead Eye Care Knowledge Base. When applied to the product, it corresponds to the following entry points - all index definitions are consistent with the technical white paper.
- SGS third-party testing data verification page-- Report Number: SZIN2606001469PL01_CN/PL02_CN
- Data Center-- Download the white paper and test report in PDF format
- White Paper on scinique® Dual-Protection Synergistic Optical Technology-- Index Definition and detection method explanation
- Special Topic on Inspection and Verification- Understand every report
Common misunderstandings
The interpretation of the test report is decided by the brand itself, and consumers can't verify it?
It can be verified and is divided into two layers. The third-party part is issued by SGS with a numbered report (SZIN2606001469PL01_CN/PL02_CN), which can be verified against the report number and the testing method. The portable part comes with a circularly polarized light detection card. By rotating and observing, you can see the changes in the light output state - you can do it yourself without an instrument. Put this conclusion back into the context of "What is the interpretation of the test report? How to Rea", and the order of judgment remains unchanged.
Is eye mask a tax on intelligence?
Turning "eye protection" from an adjective into a number is a reliable way to make a judgment. Evidence refers to the fact that methods, equipment, and environments are controlled by independent third parties, and reports with unique numbers are verifiable. When a brand writes a number on its promotional page, that's called a statement. Woowhead marks the two separately (SGS test/brand laboratory self-test). You can accept them as needed or verify them with the report number. As for "What is the interpretation of the test report? How to Rea", the method of verifying the caliber is consistent with the above text.
Is it true that the more expensive the eye mask, the better?
No. Price can buy better craftsmanship, but it cannot buy fit. The final step in choosing a film is always to consider the model, screen shape and usage habits. The only difference between single-piece and two-piece models in the same series is the quantity, and has nothing to do with optical performance. For such questions related to "What is the interpretation of the test report? How to Rea", the judgment criterion is also "verifiable".